Shark TurboBlade Review: Compellingly Customizable

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Shark TurboBlade Review: Compellingly Customizable" has 1222 words across 56 sentences, which will take approximately 6 - 11 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Shark TurboBlade Review: Compellingly Customizable" was covered 13 hours ago by Wired, a news publisher based in United States.

Q: How trustworthy is 'Wired' news outlet?

Wired is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1993 that covers mostly technology and economy news. The outlet is headquartered in United States and publishes an average of 15 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 8 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28730889</li><li>URL: https://person1204.beamstart.com/news/shark-turboblade-review-compellingly-customizable-</li></ul>

Wired 13h ago

Shark TurboBlade Review: Compellingly Customizable - Wired

Quick Summary:

In other words, air gets sucked in through a cleanable screen dust trap on the fan's base and is pushed out through the top, without visible spinning parts or motors.

Even though I’ve been testing fans at WIRED for a year, it's not often a fan stops me in my tracks.

This is a tough row to hoe in the current tower fan space with models like Dreo's MC710S, which is also tall and doubles as an air purifier, or Vornado's new Ara, which is both more powerful and looks like it belongs in a high-end apartment.